Public Law

Should the COVID-19 pandemic broaden states’ margin of appreciation under the European Convention on Human Rights?

Abstract Questions have been raised over the compatibility of national restrictions imposed due to the COVID-19 pandemic with Contracting States’ obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights (‘ECHR’). Yet, the public emergency caused by the pandemic also means that the ECHR is likely to afford states a margin of appreciation when deciding on the […]

Should the COVID-19 pandemic broaden states’ margin of appreciation under the European Convention on Human Rights? Read More »

Judicial Review Reform: The Move from Constitutional Democracy to Elective Dictatorship

Introduction The Government has been promising to change the system of judicial review for a considerable amount of time.1 In July 2021, it introduced the Judicial Review and Courts Bill2 which, at the time of writing, is going through the Second Reading in the House of Commons. Although very delicate and sensitive language was used in Consultation

Judicial Review Reform: The Move from Constitutional Democracy to Elective Dictatorship Read More »

Elgizouli v Secretary of State for the Home Department : Redefining the scope of common law constitutional rights?

Introduction In Elgizouli v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Supreme Court considered whether it was unlawful for the Secretary of State to authorise mutual legal assistance (“MLA”) to the United States in order to assist a criminal investigation which could lead to the imposition of the death penalty on a suspected British terrorist.1 This

Elgizouli v Secretary of State for the Home Department : Redefining the scope of common law constitutional rights? Read More »

Rethinking the concept of the Rule of Law in Modern Britain

INTRODUCTION Western countries take pride in their orderly constitutional systems which reflect their aspirations to respect human rights and the rule of law (“RoL”). However, when considering the actual meaning and intended genuine effect of the RoL, the concept actually generates more confusion than its inconclusive terminology suggests. Situating the concept of the RoL in

Rethinking the concept of the Rule of Law in Modern Britain Read More »

My Body, My Choice: How Might Artificial Wombs Endanger the Viability Doctrine? Limits to Abortion, Criminalisation and Reconciling the Maternal/Fetal Balance

I. Introduction Scientific research suggests that the implementation of artificial wombs for human fetuses (ectogenesis) is foreseeable within the next few decades,1 having already been used successfully for lamb fetuses.2 However, the current law is ill-equipped to deal with the conflict of rights which will ensue. Ectogenesis will reshape pre-natal viability and procedures, decreasing the mortality rate

My Body, My Choice: How Might Artificial Wombs Endanger the Viability Doctrine? Limits to Abortion, Criminalisation and Reconciling the Maternal/Fetal Balance Read More »

‘Keep the Powder Dry’: The Court of Appeal in Fearn v Tate Gallery

It is safe to say that the claimants in Fearn v Tate Gallery1, owners of multi-million pound, highly exclusive London flats, are not among the neediest of those who have applied to human rights law for help. However, the decision of Mann J in the High Court,2 while focusing primarily on the tort of nuisance, did raise

‘Keep the Powder Dry’: The Court of Appeal in Fearn v Tate Gallery Read More »

Protecting Rights under the Common Law: R(UNISON) v Lord Chancellor

Introduction: In the case of R(UNISON) v Lord Chancellor,1 the Supreme Court ruled that the Lord Chancellor’s Fee Orders for the Employment Tribunal (ET) and the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) were unlawful because they limited access to justice. This article will first set out the background facts and context behind the appeal. Then, it will highlight the

Protecting Rights under the Common Law: R(UNISON) v Lord Chancellor Read More »

Private law protection of human rights from corporate abuses: deep and meaningful?

Commentary on Lungowe and others v Vedanta Resources plc and Kokola Copper Mines plc [2019] UKSC 201 The need to secure individual human rights from corporate malpractice is of increasing importance in recent years in light of industrial incidents causing considerable injury to individuals and damage to properties and the environment.2 The UK Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lungowe

Private law protection of human rights from corporate abuses: deep and meaningful? Read More »

The delicate balance between Carl Schmitt’s constituent power and liberal constitutionalism: a misunderstood and over-complicated dichotomy?

The tension between constituent power and a liberal theory of constitutionalism is important in constitutional theory as they paint very different perceptions of the nature of authority in a constitution. Constituent power is “the power through which the prince’s power to rule was authorised,”1 and its primary function is to “specify in constitutional language the ultimate

The delicate balance between Carl Schmitt’s constituent power and liberal constitutionalism: a misunderstood and over-complicated dichotomy? Read More »