LSE Law Review Blog

Announcements

Volume IX Out Now!

The LSE Law Review Spring 2025 Issue and Volume X 2024-25 (compilation of Summer 2024, Winter 2024 and Spring 2025 Issues) has been published. Head out to our main website to read it: https://lawreview.lse.ac.uk

Recent Posts

Inspiration for a Commitment to Justice

Many lawyers find inspiration from a mentor or a legal text, others find it elsewhere. I am one of the latter types. It’s not that I haven’t worked with, or known, some remarkable and inspiring...

In Doctrinal Limbo: Enforcing Annulled Arbitral Awards Under the New York Convention

Abstract Article V(1)(e) of the New York Convention appears to preserve a margin of discretion for courts of contracting states to refuse the enforcement of an arbitral award if it has been annulled...

Going Out on a Third Limb: The Problem of the Law of Insanity’s Insistence on Insane Delusions over Irresistible Impulses.

Abstract The insanity rules in England and Wales are potentially per incuriam. While the modern interpretation of the M’Naghten rules recognises the Cognitive and Wrongfulness Limbs, a third Control...

The Ramifications of State Conceptualisation on Contemporary Manifestations of Judicial Review

Abstract This note will comparatively analyse the contested existence and development of the state and administrative law of the UK and France, subsequently using this historical perspective to...

Constitutional Adaptation in Europe’s New Age

Abstract The EU, like any other legal or political framework, is relevant insofar as it is capable of adapting to the needs and challenges that it faces. While this is accepted by its different...

A Look at the ICC’s Philippines Decision: Is a Preliminary Examination enough for the Court to retain jurisdiction?

Abstract This article aims to build a case in favour of the minority decision in the ICC’s Philippines judgment. The decision has been a source of contention amongst international law scholars, and...

Two Worlds Collide? Exploring the Role and Significance of tikanga Māori in Smith v Fonterra Co-Operative Group Ltd [2024] NZSC 5

Abstract This case note examines the New Zealand Supreme Court decision in Smith v Fonterra Co-Operative Group Ltd NZSC 5. It explores the broader relationship between tikanga Māori and common law...

Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v Switzerland: To what extent does the application of UNSC Resolution 1483 impact the protection of individuals’ human rights in the pursuit of global security?

Abstract This essay offers a fresh perspective on the interplay between international security measures and individual human rights by critically analysing the application of United Nations Security...

Revisiting the International Court of Justice’s Treatment of Non-Geographical Factors in Maritime Delimitation Cases: Somalia v Kenya as a Magnifying Glass

Introduction In contentious maritime disputes, the International Court of Justice uses a ‘three-stage’ approach to delineate maritime boundaries. This comprises (a) the drawing of a provisional...

Reassessing Nottebohm in an Era of Global Mobility

Abstract Despite heavy criticism, the ‘genuine link test’ for assessing the bindingness of a conferral of citizenship on third States, devised by the International Court of Justice in the 1955 case of...