Notes Editors


Posts by Austin Chan

No Cake for You: The Legal Battle for Equal Treatment in Lee v McArthur & Ors

Lee v McArthur & Ors [2016] NICA 39, commonly known as the ‘Gay Wedding Cake’ case, is currently awaiting judgment from the UK Supreme Court (‘UKSC’). Lee promises to provide vital gu...

In Public Law, Sep 08, 2018

Posts by Ann-Marie Sous

R v. Evans: An Uneasy Precedent?

R v. Evans: An Uneasy Precedent?

In Criminal Law, Nov 29, 2019

Posts by Claudia Tam

Extraditing suspects and safeguarding human rights - a tangled tale

Commentary on Kyung Yip Kim v Ministry of Justice of New Zealand and another [2019] NZCA 209 and insights on the Fugitive Offenders and Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Legisla...

In Public Law, Jun 25, 2019

Posts by Ching Suen

Material contribution: bridging the evidentiary gap

To right a private wrong, causation is generally established between the tortfeasor’s negligent act and claimant’s injury. However, on occasion, the evidence will be such that a causal li...

In Private Law, Sep 15, 2019

Posts by Dr. Floris de Witte

Posts by Gloria Schiavo

The 'Live-in Requirement' for Foreign Domestic Helpers in Hong Kong: Fundamental Rights at Risk?

Case note: Lubiano v The Director of Immigration HCAL 210/2016

In Public Law, Sep 13, 2018

Posts by Himmy Lui

Posts by Isabel Hahn

The Undisclosed Principal: Limiting Liability for Negligent Misrepresentations

Banca Nazionale del Lavoro SPA v Playboy Club London Limited and others [2018] UKSC 43 concerns a claim for pure economic loss due to a negligent misrepresentation. It sets a precedent fo...

In Private Law, Sep 27, 2018

Posts by Jason Lin

Privilege against Self-Incrimination in Civil Injunctions: the Double-Edged Sword of Themis?

In general, the privilege against self-incrimination (“PSI”) protects a defendant from being compelled to provide (potentially) incriminating statement or information. PSI may be asserted...

In Criminal Law, Oct 09, 2019

Posts by Josias Senu

European Integration, Brexit and Democracy: What do we do now?

Over the past two decades, the European Union has experienced an increased disjuncture between its political vision for peace, prosperity and security and the democratic mandate of the pe...

In Public Law, Aug 10, 2018

Employees or Independent Contractors: What Defines a “Worker”?

Pimlico Plumbers Limited v Smith [2018] UKSC 29 deals with several important issues concerning an intermediate category of working people falling between an “employee” under a contract of...

In Private Law, Aug 02, 2018

Posts by Jonathan Fisher QC

Posts by Lora Izvorova

English Choice of Law in Contract Under the Rome I Regime: Is Flexibility Giving Way to Predictability?

The Rome I Regulation (593/2008/EC) is the EU regulation which governs the choice of law applicable to contractual obligations in civil and commercial matters. It replaces the 1980 Rome C...

In Private Law, Oct 16, 2018

Posts by Mahmoud Serewel

Posts by Naina Gupta

Posts by Narjis Khan

Posts by Thomas Yeon

Private law protection of human rights from corporate abuses: deep and meaningful?

Commentary on Lungowe and others v Vedanta Resources plc and Kokola Copper Mines plc [2019] UKSC 201

In Public Law, Oct 17, 2019

The delicate balance between Carl Schmitt’s constituent power and liberal constitutionalism: a misunderstood and over-complicated dichotomy?

The tension between constituent power and a liberal theory of constitutionalism is important in constitutional theory as they paint very different perceptions of the nature of authority i...

In Public Law, Sep 23, 2019

Public sneaking into private horizontally: the development of private law as supported by the Human Rights Act 1998

Case note: Fearn and others v The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery [2019] EWHC 246 (Ch)

In Public Law, Aug 04, 2019

Extraditing suspects and safeguarding human rights - a tangled tale

Commentary on Kyung Yip Kim v Ministry of Justice of New Zealand and another [2019] NZCA 209 and insights on the Fugitive Offenders and Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Legisla...

In Public Law, Jun 25, 2019

A tale of two systems: separation or separability of Hong Kong common law and Chinese socialist legal system?

Case note: Sixtus Leung v President of the Legislative Council  HCAL 1160, 1164, 1165, 1171 & 1178/20181

In Public Law, Mar 07, 2019

“I felt cheated”[1]: a lost opportunity for upholding a right to terminate life with dignity

Case note: R (on the application of Conway) v Secretary of State for Justice (27 November 2018)2

In Public Law, Feb 10, 2019

A symphony of parliamentary sovereignty

– Case note: Case C-621/18 Wightman v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union

In Public Law, Jan 21, 2019

Medical exceptionalism: Best Interests From a Human Rights Perspective

Case note: Y v An NHS Trust and others [2018] UKSC 461

In Public Law, Dec 10, 2018

Posts by Thomas Howard

Would becoming a republic be so simple?

Would becoming a republic be so simple?

In Public Law, Oct 21, 2019

Posts by Madeleine Lusted

Posts by Samantha Goh

Afghanistan: Towards wider interests of justice?

The Pre-Trial Chamber (“PTC”) II of the International Criminal Court (“ICC”) handed down its much-awaited decision on the request for authorisation of an investigation into the situation ...

In International Law, Sep 01, 2019

Posts by Claudia-Skye Lee Xin

Posts by Simon Witney

Posts by William Wong

Darnley v Croydon Health Service NHS Trust: delineating duty and breach

Case Note: Darnley v Croydon Health Service NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50, [2018] 3 WLR 1153

In Private Law, Mar 13, 2019

Creating easements with ease: *Re Ellenborough Park* test revisited

Case note: Regency Villas Title Ltd v Diamond Resorts (Europe) Ltd [2018] UKSC 57

In Private Law, Jan 26, 2019

Posts by Andreas Daum

The ECJ's Judgements on 'Gmail' and 'Skype Out': A Critical Review

A critical review of the ECJ’s Judgments on ‘Gmail’ and ‘Skype Out’

In International Law, Jul 16, 2020

Posts by Mythili Mishra

Posts by Daniel Henderson

'Keep the Powder Dry': The Court of Appeal in Fearn v Tate Gallery

It is safe to say that the claimants in Fearn v Tate Gallery1, owners of multi-million pound, highly exclusive London flats, are not among the neediest of those who have applied to human ...

In Public Law, Sep 22, 2020

Posts by Julius Chen Ma

Posts by Mahathi Utham Kumar and Hrishikesh Anand

Posts by Mathias Baudena

Posts by Karen Viktoria Akerø-Stueland

Posts by Kevin Gerenni

Posts by James Brown

Posts by Osama Shaaban